Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vinicius904's avatar

Gold this one, like $GTX report! Thanks Maksim for the work! Hope you Keep doing it. Free or not, I'll be here to suport.

Expand full comment
James Emanuel's avatar

The wording of the contract amendments are interesting. Mr. Askarpour, CEO, seems concerned about being terminated without cause. Think about that.

If you were looking to acquire a company, then wouldn't you want to take ownership of a well run business by keeping the existing management? It's what Buffett does. Management comes first.

If Mr. Askarpour is concerned about being terminated post acquisition, does that suggest that there is tension between the majority shareholder and the board?

Why would that be?

An alternative interpretation is that Mr. Askarpour is putting his own personal interests before those of the company and its shareholders. He should want what is best for the business and if that means a change of ownership, so be it. But he seems concerned that the new owner would oust him.

The levels of stock based comp (RSU and PSU) relative to net income, and consequential shareholder dilution, also suggests that management is not motivated by what is best for shareholders.

Harborne's letter states, "I now firmly believe that the Company is not well positioned to achieve this long-term potential in its current configuration... [and if he acquired the business, shareholders would not be] subject to the significant operational and financial risks inherent in the Company’s business."

To me that sounds like he has no faith in the existing management being able to deliver on the company's potential.

Revenue has increased over the past few years, but at the expense of margins.

The CEO talks a good game, but there is tension here for sure. Either Harborne is right or the CEO is right, but they can't both be right. Since Harborne is putting his own money behind his belief, I am more inclined to believe his position than I am to believe a CEO who is self interested and tries to enrich himself with PSUs and RSUs and changes to his contract of employment.

I may be wrong, but something doesn't smell right here. I like to see harmony in a business between owners and management - not conflict. For me this isn't investing, it is speculating in the hope of a favourable outcome. Just my opinion - I may be entirely wrong, but I'll pass on this.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts